Is Photography Art Reading Answers? Best Answer

Introduction To Is Photography Art Reading Answers

Is Photography Art Reading Answers

This question ( is photography art reading answers) may overflow today. Surrounded by thousands of photographs, most of us assume that photographs not only provide information and attract attention, but also serve as decoration, to provide spiritual enrichment, and to provide meaningful insight into a passing scene. But in recent decades, after the invention of photography, this demand for research has shown ways to integrate the mechanical medium into traditional forms of expressive art.

The very debated assertion by the painter Paul Delaroche, that he noted the daguerreotype*, confuses the purpose of painting because this wise artist also predicted the usefulness of this medium to graphic artists in his letters from 1839. between absolute rejection and nuanced rejection. a very typical reception of the medium of art. The debate about the role of art photography was particularly alive in France, where the domestic politics of the time produced a notable group of artists, but it was also raised with great voices in England. In both countries, public interest in the subject reflected the belief that national status and artistic performance were connected.

Important Things To Know About

From the contradictory errors and published articles on the subject, three major theories have emerged about the power of photographic art. The simplest, defended by many painters and part of the public, was that images should not be considered art, because they were created by mechanical and physical devices and chemicals rather than by hand and mind; It seemed to some that the camera images had more in common with the machinery manufactured in the factories than with inspired designs and accessories.

The second is a widely held opinion, shared by painters, some photographers, and some critics, that images are useful for art, but that drawing and painting should be equated to creating characters. Finally, suppose the process is similar to other techniques such as sculpture and lithography. In that case, many people have realized that photographs taken are as important as works of art made by hand and that they can have a positive impact—on art and humanity in the country. the Nederlands general

Artists responded to photography in different ways. Many portrait painters, particularly miniaturists, realizing that photography represented “the writing on the wall”, turned to the daguerreotype, or photograph on paper, to try to save their careers; some incorporated it into painting, while others refrained from painting.

Other painters, notably the French painter Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres, almost immediately began using photography to record their output and also to obtain source material for poses and backgrounds. its vision or claims as art.

Lacan and Francis Wey developed the idea that photographs can be useful to artists. The latter, an art and literature critic who ultimately recognized that images captured by cameras could be both inspiring and informative, suggested that they would lead to greater naturalness in the graphic representation of anatomy, clothing, likeness, expression, and landscape. By studying photography, he claimed, true artists would be freed from menial tasks and could devote themselves to the more important spiritual aspects of their work.

We have yet to mention what an incompetent artist might do to replace them, but according to the influential French critic and poet Charles Baudelaire, writing in 1859 in response to a photography exhibition, painters became lazy and talented photographers.

Driven by artistic creation as an imaginative form of cultivated things and dreams, Baudelaire considered photography “the most humble servant of art and science”; a medium largely incapable of transcending “external reality.” This criticism of photography is linked to the “great madness of the industry” of the time, which according to him would have had fatal consequences for spiritual life and art.

History

Eugène Delacroix was the most prominent French artist who supported photography but recognized its limitations. Regretting that “a wonderful discovery” had come so late in his life, he took a daguerreotype class and commissioned the collection of photographs. Delacroix’s study as a medium is palpable in a blog post that notes that if they were to use photographs, the artist “doesn’t yet know how far they can go.”

Is Photography Art Reading Answers

Question-Related To This Topics: 

The question of whether a photograph is a document or a work of art is also of interest in England. The main proposal in this regard was an unsigned article that concluded that, while photography had a role to play, it should not be “restricted” to “competing” with art; A stricter view led critic Philip Gilbert Hamerton to publish camera footage taken “in an environment, one might say emphatically, in which ten falsehoods are told about a single truth.”

These writers represented resistance on the part of the cultural elite of England and France to the “cheapness of art” due to the growing acceptance and purchase of photography by the middle classes. Technology made photographs common in the shop windows of Regent Street and Piccadilly in London and on advertising billboards in Bologna.

In London, for example, there were around 130 retail outlets where portraits, landscapes, and reproductions of photographic works of art could be purchased. This media appeal convinced selectors that the images promoted nostalgia rather than idealism, although some critics recognized that the work of individual photographers could emphasize style and content consistent with the art’s defining characteristics.

History of photographic techniques

Photography may have been invented “formally” in the 19th century. But that was a long time ago, long before the days of telegraphs and typewriters. Using primitive camera obscura techniques, we can trace the philosophy of photography back to the Neolithic period. But what is a camera obscura?

Well, here’s a hint: camera obscura means “dark room.” In practice, it is an image projection system in which light enters a dark area through a small aperture, ultimately creating a rudimentary image. The following video from the George Eastman Museum shows us how to turn any room into a dark room.

Some historians claim that hominids used a camera obscura to project images that they could trace with stone tools. In the 4th century BC, the Chinese philosopher Han Mozi wrote about the camera obscura (although under a different name) as a tool for capturing rays of light.

The Greek philosopher Aristotle expanded on Mozi’s ideas in his Corpus Aristotelicum Problems – The book puts the fingers of one hand on the fingers of the other, are the rays shaped like a crescent when they reach the earth? Is it for the same reason as when light shines? through a rectangular peephole, does it appear circular in the shape of a cone?

More About The History of photographic techniques

Is Photography Art Reading Answers

Nearly 2,000 years after Aristotle’s problems, Renaissance inventor Leonardo da Vinci formally described the darkroom in his Codex Atlanticus of 1502. He said: “When the facade of a building, of a place or landscape is illuminated by the sun and a small A hole is drilled in the wall of a room of a building opposite, which is not directly illuminated by the sun, then all objects illuminated by the sun will send their images through this opening and appear face down on the wall facing the hole.

But while Mozi, Aristotle, Da Vinci, and others understood how the camera obscura worked, they did not know how to capture permanent images. This is where Nicéphore Niépce comes in.

When was the first photograph taken?

When was the first photo taken?

The camera obscura may have been a useful tool for high-quality images, but it was not capable of permanently capturing images. So let’s get back to the question: when was photography invented? Photography as we know it was discovered in 1822 by the French author Nicéphore Niépce.

Niepce is considered the father of invention and the invention of the world’s first internal combustion engine (but that’s for another day). Below are traces of Niépce’s attempts to take the first photograph.

Niépce’s early lithographs used silver plates with Jewish bitumen and violet oil to create a primitive form of photography. This process is called heliography, which comes from the Greek helios, meaning sun, and graphein, meaning writing. The combination involved a solar writing process, which perhaps looked more like etching than photography.

But Niépce finally made the breakthrough for him in 1826/27 with this photograph “View from the Window of Le Gras”, which many scholars suggest was the first photograph ever taken and enlarged.

Is Photography Art Reading Answers

When did you already find the recipe? View of Niepce from the window of Le Gras

Very few believed Niépce when he presented the photograph of him to the world. Skeptics suggested they were fake, illustrators suggested they were ridiculous, and others just didn’t care. It took years for photography to offer any kind of commercial appeal, which is a shame for the ‘founder’ of the format, who left with very little praise for his work.

For More Information Visit Zeelmaudpate

Leave a Comment